[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130814100101.GC10849@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:01:01 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-current tree with Linus' tree
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-current tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c between commit b88a2595b6d8 ("perf/arm: Fix
> armpmu_map_hw_event()") from Linus' tree and commit d9f966357b14 ("ARM:
> 7810/1: perf: Fix array out of bounds access in armpmu_map_hw_event()")
> from the arm-current tree.
>
> These are the same patch except for the return code (and the much more
> comprehensive commit message in the arm-current tree version). I fixed
> it up (using the arm-current tree version - return -EINVAL instead of
> -ENOENT - I have no way to guess which is right) and can carry the fix
> as necessary (no action is required).
-EINVAL would be the better/cleaner one, so when this gets merged upstream
we should pick up Russell's version. It does not affect functionality.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists