linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/hvc: If we use xen_raw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130814124647.GD10764@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:46:47 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Cc:	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/hvc: If we use xen_raw_printk let it
 also work on HVM guests.

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:15:56AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 20:10 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:20:05PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 21:59 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > What it should be is:
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > >  void xen_raw_console_write(const char *str)
> > > > > > >  {
> > > > > > > -	dom0_write_console(0, str, strlen(str));
> > > > > > > +	if (!xen_domain())
> > > > > > > +		return;
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +	if (xen_pv_domain())
> > > > >             xen_domain()
> > > > > 
> > > > > > > +		dom0_write_console(0, str, strlen(str));
> > > > > > > +	else if (xen_hvm_domain() || xen_cpuid_base()) {
> > > > >      
> > > > > 	else if (xen_cpuid_base()) {
> > > > > 
> > > > > > > +		/* The hyperpage has not been setup yet. */
> > > > > > > +		int i, len = strlen(str);
> > > > > > > +		for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> > > > > > > +			 outb(str[i], 0xe9);
> > > > > > > +	}
> > > > > > >  }
> > > > > 
> > > > > And then that should adhere to what I wrote up.
> > > > 
> > > > I think it does too.
> > > 
> > > Except as Daniel notes in <520A7145.5010306@...ho.nsa.gov> for unrelated
> > > reasons:
> > > 
> > > >         HVM guests can still use the PV output - they just need to use the console
> > > >         write hypercall instead of the HVM I/O port. I would think that PVH guests
> > > >         would default to using the hypercall as it is more efficient (it takes a
> > > >         string rather than one character per write).
> > > >         
> > > >         Actually, checking... the console_io hypercall would need to be added to
> > > >         the hvm_hypercall{32,64}_table for an HVM guest to be able to use it; they
> > > >         currently must use the I/O port. I didn't check the PVH patches.
> > > 
> > > Or did you actually try this code and it worked?
> > 
> > The one I typed up above - no. The one I had sent - yes.
> > 
> > But with that above mentioned comment from Daniel I think it is still
> > worth trying to do dom0_write_console and if the hypercall returns -ENOSYS 
> > then fall back on 0xe9.
> > 
> > And lastly send an patch to make hypercall_io work under HVM.
> 
> So you didn't try under PVHVM? That's what I was asking when I asked if
> you tried it, since that is the point of this patch.

Not the one I typed up above. Just the one I sent. I have a habit of
sending patches that have been tested first - and I hadn't had the chance
yet to redo it the way above.

> 
> Ian.
> 
> Ian.
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/