linux-kernel - Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130814124904.GQ23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 14 Aug 2013 13:49:04 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 01:44:44PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 14 August 2013 11:33, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it,
> >> or do we need a test on real hardware ?
> >
> > Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing
> > to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another
> > change to this.
> >
> > Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so
> > it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff.
> 
> Yes, I definitely think we should test on the hardware before we
> land yet another change to this PCI code that hasn't really been
> thoroughly tested on anything. I have the board/backplane on my
> desk but it'll be later in the week before I can do the testing
> (currently still messing with uboot config to get it to actually
> boot a kernel).

Realview or Versatile?  I still need to sort out Realview.

The alternative is - I have both the Realview EB and Versatile PB926
here, but no backplane (it wasn't deemed to be necessary for me to
have such a thing.)  If someone wants to donate a backplane...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/