[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130814144449.GA9485@samfundet.no>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:44:49 +0200
From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/37] cpufreq: at32ap: don't initialize part of policy
that is set by core too
Around Wed 14 Aug 2013 20:07:44 +0530 or thereabout, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 14 August 2013 20:05, Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no> wrote:
>> Around Wed 14 Aug 2013 19:01:53 +0530 or thereabout, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
>>> this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.
>>>
>>> Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
>>> ->init().
>>
>> It would be easier to review if you add me to CC on the new APIs you
>> implement as well. Now I had to look up what the ->get() call did.
>
> I know my track record hasn't been impressive on this subject but I am
> sure I am following this since sometime now :)
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/14/285
Sorry, my bad, I actually had gotten it, it was just so too short to notice.
--
mvh
Hans-Christian Egtvedt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists