linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] sched: factor out code to should_we

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130815123422.GT24092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:34:22 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] sched: factor out code to should_we_balance()

On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:36:42PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> -	if (local_group)
> -		balance_cpu = group_balance_cpu(group);
> -

>  		/* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
> -		if (local_group) {
> -			if (idle_cpu(i) && !first_idle_cpu &&
> -					cpumask_test_cpu(i, sched_group_mask(group))) {
> -				first_idle_cpu = 1;
> -				balance_cpu = i;
> -			}
> -
>  			load = target_load(i, load_idx);
> -		} else {

>  
> -	/*
> -	 * First idle cpu or the first cpu(busiest) in this sched group
> -	 * is eligible for doing load balancing at this and above
> -	 * domains. In the newly idle case, we will allow all the cpu's
> -	 * to do the newly idle load balance.
> -	 */
> -	if (local_group) {
> -		if (env->idle != CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) {
> -			if (balance_cpu != env->dst_cpu) {
> -				*balance = 0;
> -				return;
> -			}
> -			update_group_power(env->sd, env->dst_cpu);
> -		} else if (time_after_eq(jiffies, group->sgp->next_update))
> -			update_group_power(env->sd, env->dst_cpu);
> -	}

>  		local_group = cpumask_test_cpu(env->dst_cpu, sched_group_cpus(sg));

> +static int should_we_balance(struct lb_env *env)
> +{
> +	struct sched_group *sg = env->sd->groups;
> +	struct cpumask *sg_cpus, *sg_mask;
> +	int cpu, balance_cpu = -1;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * In the newly idle case, we will allow all the cpu's
> +	 * to do the newly idle load balance.
> +	 */
> +	if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE)
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	sg_cpus = sched_group_cpus(sg);
> +	sg_mask = sched_group_mask(sg);
> +	/* Try to find first idle cpu */
> +	for_each_cpu_and(cpu, sg_cpus, env->cpus) {
> +		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sg_mask) || idle_cpu(cpu))

Did you want to write !idle_cpu() ?

> +			continue;
> +
> +		balance_cpu = cpu;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (balance_cpu == -1)
> +		balance_cpu = group_balance_cpu(sg);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * First idle cpu or the first cpu(busiest) in this sched group
> +	 * is eligible for doing load balancing at this and above domains.
> +	 */
> +	return balance_cpu != env->dst_cpu;
> +}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/