[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130815180521.GV24092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:05:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] sched: clean-up struct sd_lb_stat
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:36:43PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> - if (sds->group_imb) {
> - sds->busiest_load_per_task =
> - min(sds->busiest_load_per_task, sds->avg_load);
> + if (busiest->group_imb) {
> + busiest->load_per_task =
> + min(busiest->load_per_task, sds->sd_avg_load);
> }
> - if (sds->max_load < sds->avg_load) {
> + if (busiest->avg_load < this->avg_load) {
Tsk, inconsistency there.
> - max_pull = min(sds->max_load - sds->avg_load, load_above_capacity);
> + max_pull = min(busiest->avg_load - sds->sd_avg_load,
> + load_above_capacity);
you just made it possible for the above subtraction to become negative.
Also not entirely sure why you renamed sds->avg_load; renaming it back.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists