[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520D18F7.5000801@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:07:51 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm/vmalloc: use wrapper function get_vm_area_size
to caculate size of vm area
On 08/14/2013 05:31 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 93d3182..553368c 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -1553,7 +1553,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> unsigned int nr_pages, array_size, i;
> gfp_t nested_gfp = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) | __GFP_ZERO;
>
> - nr_pages = (area->size - PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + nr_pages = get_vm_area_size(area) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> array_size = (nr_pages * sizeof(struct page *));
I guess this is fine, but I do see this same kind of use in a couple of
other spots in the kernel. Was there a reason for doing this in this
one spot but ignoring the others?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists