linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 3/4] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1376586580-5409-4-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:09:39 +0100
From:	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au, linux@...ts.openrisc.net,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc:	Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/4] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures

From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>

Currently different drivers requiring to access cpu device node are
parsing the device tree themselves. Since the ordering in the DT need
not match the logical cpu ordering, the parsing logic needs to consider
that. However, this has resulted in lots of code duplication and in some
cases even incorrect logic.

It's better to consolidate them by adding support for getting cpu
device node for a given logical cpu index in DT core library. However
logical to physical index mapping can be architecture specific.

PowerPC has it's own implementation to get the cpu node for a given
logical index.

This patch refactors the current implementation of of_get_cpu_node.
This in preparation to move the implementation to DT core library.
It separates out the logical to physical mapping so that a default
matching of the physical id to the logical cpu index can be added
when moved to common code. Architecture specific code can override it.

Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
index eb23ac9..594c9f9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
@@ -865,45 +865,61 @@ static int __init prom_reconfig_setup(void)
 __initcall(prom_reconfig_setup);
 #endif
 
+bool arch_match_cpu_phys_id(int cpu, u64 phys_id)
+{
+	return (int)phys_id == get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu);
+}
+
+static bool __of_find_n_match_cpu_property(struct device_node *cpun,
+			const char *prop_name, int cpu, unsigned int *thread)
+{
+	const __be32 *cell;
+	int ac, prop_len, tid;
+	u64 hwid;
+
+	ac = of_n_addr_cells(cpun);
+	cell = of_get_property(cpun, prop_name, &prop_len);
+	if (!cell)
+		return false;
+	prop_len /= sizeof(*cell);
+	for (tid = 0; tid < prop_len; tid++) {
+		hwid = of_read_number(cell, ac);
+		if (arch_match_cpu_phys_id(cpu, hwid)) {
+			if (thread)
+				*thread = tid;
+			return true;
+		}
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
 /* Find the device node for a given logical cpu number, also returns the cpu
  * local thread number (index in ibm,interrupt-server#s) if relevant and
  * asked for (non NULL)
  */
 struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu, unsigned int *thread)
 {
-	int hardid;
-	struct device_node *np;
+	struct device_node *cpun, *cpus;
 
-	hardid = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu);
+	cpus = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
+	if (!cpus) {
+		pr_warn("Missing cpus node, bailing out\n");
+		return NULL;
+	}
 
-	for_each_node_by_type(np, "cpu") {
-		const u32 *intserv;
-		unsigned int plen, t;
+	for_each_child_of_node(cpus, cpun) {
+		if (of_node_cmp(cpun->type, "cpu"))
+			continue;
 
 		/* Check for ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s. If it doesn't exist
 		 * fallback to "reg" property and assume no threads
 		 */
-		intserv = of_get_property(np, "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s",
-				&plen);
-		if (intserv == NULL) {
-			const u32 *reg = of_get_property(np, "reg", NULL);
-			if (reg == NULL)
-				continue;
-			if (*reg == hardid) {
-				if (thread)
-					*thread = 0;
-				return np;
-			}
-		} else {
-			plen /= sizeof(u32);
-			for (t = 0; t < plen; t++) {
-				if (hardid == intserv[t]) {
-					if (thread)
-						*thread = t;
-					return np;
-				}
-			}
-		}
+		if (__of_find_n_match_cpu_property(cpun,
+				"ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s", cpu, thread))
+			return cpun;
+
+		if (__of_find_n_match_cpu_property(cpun, "reg", cpu, thread))
+			return cpun;
 	}
 	return NULL;
 }
-- 
1.8.1.2


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/