linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 0/4] DT: move of_get_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1376586580-5409-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:09:36 +0100
From:	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au, linux@...ts.openrisc.net,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc:	Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] DT: move of_get_cpu_node from PPC to DT core

From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>

Hi,

This series needs to be prepended with the original series[1][2][3]
Except the first patch in the original series(which is merged into this
as last patch), there is no other change(apart from function signature)
I am posting only this part for feedback separately for review as the
original series is already reviewed. Once this part is review and aknowledged
I will combine the complete series and post it.

Hi Rob,

Since the compatible 'ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s' is one-off and for
historical reasons, if future architectures are adhering to ePAPR,
IMO having a weak definition of arch_of_cpu_get_node as you suggested
could lead to it's misuse in future. So I didn't take that approach.

Regards,
Sudeep

Sudeep KarkadaNagesha (4):
  microblaze: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration
  openrisc: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration
  powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures
  of: move of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library

 arch/microblaze/include/asm/prom.h |  3 --
 arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h   |  3 --
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h    |  3 --
 arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c         | 43 +----------------
 drivers/of/base.c                  | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/cpu.h                |  1 +
 include/linux/of.h                 |  7 +++
 7 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.1.2

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/15/128
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/17/341
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/22/219

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/