linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] Staging: olpc_dcon: replace some magic numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF92urq-bL_y9zjt9THh-LJjxrMYmdjwr7RssgBk+zxC-OhRdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:40:38 +0200
From:	Jens Frederich <jfrederich@...il.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Jon Nettleton <jon.nettleton@...il.com>,
	Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Staging: olpc_dcon: replace some magic numbers

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:34:55PM +0200, Jens Frederich wrote:
>> The 0x42 initialize squence 0x101 is wrong.  According to
>> the specification Bit 8 is reserved, thus not in use.
>> I removed it.
>
> Really these code changes should be in a separate patch and labeled
> "Don't set reserved bit." instead of hidden away inside a cleanup
> patch.
>

The patch is applied. Still, good to know. It's not so easy to find the
right patch granularity as newbie.

Greg, what's your opinion, should I split the patch up?

thanks,
jens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/