[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130816151339.GA29675@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 17:13:39 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Jaromir Capik <jcapik@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ania Honess <ahoness@...hat.com>, atomlin@...hat.com,
asolanas@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: proc/stat: idle goes backward
On 08/16, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 04:47:04PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Questions:
> >
> > - Any other reason why it can be non-monotonic?
> >
> > - Should we fix this or should we document that userspace
> > should handle this itself?
> >
> > IOW, is this is bug or not?
>
> I don't know if we want to fix it (I personally think we should because it is not the
> first time I hear complains about this) but if we do, here is a possible fix:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/8/638
Thanks! it is not easy to read the patches on lkml.org and I do
not understand this code enough. But it seems that this should
address my concerns, including the "even ignoring drivers/cpuidle/".
Except, I am not sure that these changes handle the case when
nr_iowait() change in between.
Are you going to resend?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists