[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130816164544.GK2505@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:45:44 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] print_worker_info: Handle pointer with more care
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 06:38:58PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > cc'ing uml people. Hey, guys, workqueue uses proble_kernel_read() to
> > print out workqueue related information during oops because those
> > events are completely asynchronous and workqueue states may not be
> > consistently accessible. It seems like uml doesn't implement
> > probe_kernel_read() and tries direct derference of incorrect pointers
> > leading to its own oops. Maybe uml should check whether the memory is
> > mapped from probe_kernel_read()?
>
> You are already talking to UML people. ;)
Ooh... :)
> Anyway, I'll investigate into that.
> What I see so far is that pwq is NULL after probe_kernel_read().
Yeah, and that should be fine. &pwq->wq would be just an offset of wq
from NULL which is an invalid pointer but probe_kernel_read() should
be able to handle that and probably just return 0 or -1 (all bits
set). I *think* what's necessary is making probe_kernel_read() use
mincore() to fine out whether the requested address is mapped (it
should return -EFAULT if not) and try to dereference the address iff
it's mapped.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists