[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1376751997.21329.8.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:06:37 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, edumazet@...gle.com,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH] epoll: add a reschedule point in ep_free()
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
ep_free() might iterate on a huge set of epitems and hold
cpu too long. Add two cond_resched() in order to yield cpu
to other tasks. This is safe as we only hold mutexes in
this function.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
---
Google-Bug-Id: 8940884
fs/eventpoll.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index 9ad17b15..4ff595d 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -740,6 +740,7 @@ static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep)
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
ep_unregister_pollwait(ep, epi);
+ cond_resched();
}
/*
@@ -754,6 +755,7 @@ static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep)
while ((rbp = rb_first(&ep->rbr)) != NULL) {
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
ep_remove(ep, epi);
+ cond_resched();
}
mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists