[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201308190859.32696@pali>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:59:32 +0200
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Martin Peres <martin.peres@...ri.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nouveau: fix reclocking on nv40
On Friday 16 August 2013 14:57:07 Pali Rohár wrote:
> In commit 77145f1cbdf8d28b46ff8070ca749bad821e0774 was
> introduced error which cause that reclocking on nv40 not
> working anymore. There is missing assigment of return value
> from pll_calc to ret.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@...ri.fr>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c index 3af5bcd..625f80d
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ nv40_calc_pll(struct drm_device *dev, u32
> reg, struct nvbios_pll *pll, if (clk < pll->vco1.max_freq)
> pll->vco2.max_freq = 0;
>
> - pclk->pll_calc(pclk, pll, clk, &coef);
> + ret = pclk->pll_calc(pclk, pll, clk, &coef);
> if (ret == 0)
> return -ERANGE;
Hello, it is possible to include this patch in 3.11?
Or it is too late now and need to wait for 3.12?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists