[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130819121123.GA4540@katana>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:11:23 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Hein Tibosch <hein_tibosch@...oo.es>
Cc: balbi@...com, Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-omap: always send stop after nack
Hi,
> > Which means your original patch starts to make a lot more sense. I
> > wonder is this is really what we should be doing though - breaking out
> > of the loop, I mean.
Yup, that is fine. I applied the old patch with Acks from Hein and
Felipe to -next. Thanks!
> It looks like TI's i2c-davinci will have the same problem as i2c-omap,
> and will need the same change.
Somebody up for this?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists