[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpon2UZbsZiq4r0r67FwJ+VtzCoM3=naH8qPR-PFaUGbycQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:10:05 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: amit daniel kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/34] cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag
On 19 August 2013 09:12, amit daniel kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com> wrote:
>>> + .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION,
> How about naming the flag as CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION? For platforms
> not defining this flag, the notifiers can be called synchronously from
> the core driver.
Nice.. +1
My repo will be updated with this change..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists