[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5211A273.1080903@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:13:31 +0530
From: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rjw@...k.pl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dongsheng.wang@...escale.com,
srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] cpuidle/powerpc: Backend-powerpc idle driver for
powernv and pseries.
On 08/07/2013 05:11 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 09:30 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 18:08 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> Here's another example. get_lppaca() will only build on book3s -- and
>>> yet we get requests for e500 code to use this file.
>>
>> Indeed, Besides there is already accessors afaik for lppaca that compile
>> to nothing on E (and if not they would be trivial to add).
>
> I don't see such an accessor, but if there were, what would happen when
> the caller goes on to dereference that nothing?
>
> There is an accessor for shared_proc specifically (in the spinlock code)
> -- not that it would be much help on booke to just compile away that
> check and always select one of the pseries state tables over the other.
>
> -Scott
Thanks a lot Scott and Ben for the review.
I have addressed the issues in V3 of this patch series which I have just
posted out.
Regards,
Deepthi
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists