[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32637.1376969314@ale.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:28:34 +1000
From: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
To: penberg@...nel.org
cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, michael@...erman.id.au,
Ian Munsie <ianmunsi@....ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kvm tools: powerpc: Fix init order for xics
xics_init() assumes kvm->nrcpus is already setup. kvm->nrcpus is setup
in kvm_cpu_init()
Unfortunately xics_init() and kvm_cpu_init() both use base_init(). So
depending on the order randomly determined by the compiler, xics_init()
may initialised see kvm->nrcpus as 0 and not setup any of the icp VCPU
pointers. This manifests itself later in boot when trying to raise an
IRQ resulting in a null pointer deference/segv.
This moves xics_init() to use dev_base_init() to ensure it happens after
kvm_cpu_init().
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
diff --git a/tools/kvm/powerpc/xics.c b/tools/kvm/powerpc/xics.c
index cf64a08..c1ef35b 100644
--- a/tools/kvm/powerpc/xics.c
+++ b/tools/kvm/powerpc/xics.c
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static int xics_init(struct kvm *kvm)
return 0;
}
-base_init(xics_init);
+dev_base_init(xics_init);
void kvm__irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, int level)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists