[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130820064209.GB9518@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:42:09 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
* Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > > Introduced by commit 9a55fdbe941e ("x86, asmlinkage, paravirt: Add
> > > __visible/asmlinkage to xen paravirt ops"). The 2 definitions used to be
> > > identical ... maybe there should be only one.
> >
> > Andi, please send a fix for this build warning, against
> > tip:x86/asmlinkage.
>
> I resent the patch. Thanks for the headsup.
I suspect hpa missed it because the patch was opaque and
non-descriptive: the title talks about a 'warning' that is
supposedly fixed but the changelog does not explain what
warning it is and why the change matters.
Please use the customary changelog style we use in the
kernel:
" Current code does (A), this has a problem when (B).
We can improve this doing (C), because (D)."
I've seen this pattern of deficient changelogs a dozen
times in your patches this year alone ...
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists