| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5213BC45.6020900@localhost> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:58:13 -0700 From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> CC: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>, linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.6-rt3 On 08/19/2013 05:29 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700 > Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU> wrote: > >>> The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it >>> just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their >>> definition says that it is wrong to use them and completion is the >>> right way to do it. >>> So my question is, why don't we use completion but this nasty hack? > > I think I'm going to send them an email about that. > >> In the meanwhile, any hope of a patch to be able to compile and test >> with my current configuration? > > Can you boot without enabling CONFIG_BCACHE? Just to confirm that the kernel builds, installs and boots fine without this option... -- Fernando -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists