[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1377035588.32763.7.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:53:08 -0700
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...erainc.com>,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Martin Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] target: Add support for COMPARE_AND_WRITE (VAAI)
emulation
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 23:29 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:07:51PM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> >
> > It's also currently lacking the necessary sychronization between I/O
> > submission of COMPARE_AND_WRITE verify instance and write instance
> > user data, which is still being worked on in order to avoid additional
> > overhead in the main I/O fast path.
>
> I don't think merging such a non-conforming implementation makes any sense.
>
Yes, I don't intend to merge anything that's not fully functional.
The idea was to get review going on these pieces first. I'll be posting
an PATCH-v2 to complete the implementation over the next days.
> Also for a complex command like this with all it's race potential I would
> really like to see some test cases to go along with it.
>
Yes, Eric @ PureStorage has a sg_compare_write that I'm using to test
this. It's probably about time that this be included in upstream
sg3-utils too..
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists