[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4455be44-7daf-41f0-add6-087cf992868f@email.android.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:22:21 +0200
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Subject: Re: Regression: x86/mm: new _PTE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY bit conflicts with existing use
OK now I'm confused. I guess I shouldn't comment while on vacation and cache cold on everything.
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 04:11:25PM +0200, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>
>> Eep. This should be reverted, indeed. This isn't a manifest bug on
>!Xen but we
>> have gotten requests for WT support which would mean adding in the
>PAT but again.
>
>Please no, letme fix it. That's what I'm having in mind: don't use pse
>bit in swap
>entry but always mark page read from swap as dirty one (it's better
>than having
>no tracker at all and will be the case on old machines with 32bit ptes
>only).
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists