[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <035dc4d7-10e0-4e15-bdb4-3e353b271fe4@email.android.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:22:44 +0200
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Subject: Re: Regression: x86/mm: new _PTE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY bit conflicts with existing use
Good question...
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:48:20PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> 179ef71c (mm: save soft-dirty bits on swapped pages) introduces a new
>> PTE bit on x86 _PTE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY which has the same value as
>_PTE_PSE
>> and _PTE_PAT.
>>
>> With a Xen PV guest, the use of the _PTE_PAT will result in the page
>> having unexpected cachability which will introduce a range of subtle
>> performance and correctness issues. Xen programs the entry 4 in the
>PAT
>> table with WC so a page that was previously WB will end up as WC.
>>
>
>David, could you please explain, Xen keeps and analyze _PTE_PAT bit
>for ptes which are not present?
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists