linux-kernel - RE: [patch] mm, thp: count thp_fault

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:28:17 +0300 (EEST)
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: RE: [patch] mm, thp: count thp_fault_fallback anytime thp fault fails

David Rientjes wrote:
> Currently, thp_fault_fallback in vmstat only gets incremented if a
> hugepage allocation fails.  If current's memcg hits its limit or the page
> fault handler returns an error, it is incorrectly accounted as a
> successful thp_fault_alloc.
> 
> Count thp_fault_fallback anytime the page fault handler falls back to
> using regular pages and only count thp_fault_alloc when a hugepage has
> actually been faulted.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>

It's probably a good idea, but please make the behaviour consistent in
do_huge_pmd_wp_page() and collapse path, otherwise it doesn't make sense.

And please make the patch against mm tree: do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page()
was modified recently.

> ---
>  mm/huge_memory.c | 8 +++-----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -801,7 +801,6 @@ int do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  			zero_page = get_huge_zero_page();
>  			if (unlikely(!zero_page)) {
>  				pte_free(mm, pgtable);
> -				count_vm_event(THP_FAULT_FALLBACK);
>  				goto out;
>  			}
>  			spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> @@ -816,11 +815,8 @@ int do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		}
>  		page = alloc_hugepage_vma(transparent_hugepage_defrag(vma),
>  					  vma, haddr, numa_node_id(), 0);
> -		if (unlikely(!page)) {
> -			count_vm_event(THP_FAULT_FALLBACK);
> +		if (unlikely(!page))
>  			goto out;
> -		}
> -		count_vm_event(THP_FAULT_ALLOC);
>  		if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(page, mm, GFP_KERNEL))) {
>  			put_page(page);
>  			goto out;
> @@ -832,9 +828,11 @@ int do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  			goto out;
>  		}
>  
> +		count_vm_event(THP_FAULT_ALLOC);
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  out:
> +	count_vm_event(THP_FAULT_FALLBACK);
>  	/*
>  	 * Use __pte_alloc instead of pte_alloc_map, because we can't
>  	 * run pte_offset_map on the pmd, if an huge pmd could

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/