[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130824093826.GB28383@pd.tnic>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 11:38:26 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] perf, persistent: Add persistent events
Yep,
this text is very nicely written and should be in a README somewhere.
:-)
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 04:13:15PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> This patch set implements the necessary kernel changes for persistent
> events.
>
> Persistent events run standalone in the system without the need of a
> controlling process that holds an event's file descriptor. The events
> are always enabled and collect data samples in a ring buffer.
> Processes may connect to existing persistent events using the
> perf_event_open() syscall. For this the syscall must be configured
> using the new PERF_TYPE_PERSISTENT event type and a unique event
> identifier specified in attr.config. The id is propagated in sysfs or
> using ioctl (see below).
>
> Persistent event buffers may be accessed with mmap() in the same way
> as for any other event. Since the buffers may be used by multiple
> processes at the same time, there is only read-only access to them.
> Currently there is only support for per-cpu events, thus root access
> is needed too.
>
> Persistent events are visible in sysfs. They are added or removed
> dynamically. With the information in sysfs userland knows about how to
> setup the perf_event attribute of a persistent event. Since a
> persistent event always has the persistent flag set, a way is needed
> to express this in sysfs. A new syntax is used for this. With
> 'attr<num>:<mask>' any bit in the attribute structure may be set in a
> similar way as using 'config<num>', but <num> is an index that points
> to the u64 value to change within the attribute.
>
> For persistent events the persistent flag (bit 23 of flag field in
> struct perf_event_attr) needs to be set which is expressed in sysfs
> with "attr5:23". E.g. the mce_record event is described in sysfs as
> follows:
>
> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/persistent/events/mce_record:persistent,config=106
> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/persistent/format/persistent:attr5:23
>
> Note that perf tools need to support the 'attr<num>' syntax that is
> added in a separate patch set. With it we are able to run perf tool
> commands to read persistent events, e.g.:
>
> # perf record -e persistent/mce_record/ sleep 10
> # perf top -e persistent/mce_record/
>
> In general the new syntax is flexible to describe with sysfs any event
> to be setup by perf tools.
>
> There are ioctl functions to control persistent events that can be
> used to detach or attach an event to or from a process. The
> PERF_EVENT_IOC_DETACH ioctl call makes an event persistent.
Yeah, we probably want to abstract this a step further by allowing
to attach/detach fds to/from events. Then "persistent" is only one
incarnation of us always detaching from the event during its lifetime.
If we close an event while it is attached, it gets destroyed - i.e.,
current functionality, etc. See the other thread.
But we probably need more input on this from people. Ingo, Peter?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists