| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPM31RJtQKZzb-POVY_ffoZ++vF2uZC9TkPiib-FXUrXF5UEKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 03:09:38 -0700
From: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Lei Wen <leiwen@...vell.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] sched: Clean-up struct sd_lb_stat
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
>
> There is no reason to maintain separate variables for this_group
> and busiest_group in sd_lb_stat, except saving some space.
> But this structure is always allocated in stack, so this saving
> isn't really benificial [peterz: reducing stack space is good; in this
> case readability increases enough that I think its still beneficial]
>
> This patch unify these variables, so IMO, readability may be improved.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> [peterz: lots of style edits, a few fixes and a rename]
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1375778203-31343-4-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 225 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4277,36 +4277,6 @@ static unsigned long task_h_load(struct
>
> /********** Helpers for find_busiest_group ************************/
> /*
> - * sd_lb_stats - Structure to store the statistics of a sched_domain
> - * during load balancing.
> - */
> -struct sd_lb_stats {
> - struct sched_group *busiest; /* Busiest group in this sd */
> - struct sched_group *this; /* Local group in this sd */
> - unsigned long total_load; /* Total load of all groups in sd */
> - unsigned long total_pwr; /* Total power of all groups in sd */
> - unsigned long avg_load; /* Average load across all groups in sd */
> -
> - /** Statistics of this group */
> - unsigned long this_load;
> - unsigned long this_load_per_task;
> - unsigned long this_nr_running;
> - unsigned long this_has_capacity;
> - unsigned int this_idle_cpus;
> -
> - /* Statistics of the busiest group */
> - unsigned int busiest_idle_cpus;
> - unsigned long max_load;
> - unsigned long busiest_load_per_task;
> - unsigned long busiest_nr_running;
> - unsigned long busiest_group_capacity;
> - unsigned long busiest_has_capacity;
> - unsigned int busiest_group_weight;
> -
> - int group_imb; /* Is there imbalance in this sd */
> -};
> -
> -/*
> * sg_lb_stats - stats of a sched_group required for load_balancing
> */
> struct sg_lb_stats {
> @@ -4314,6 +4284,7 @@ struct sg_lb_stats {
> unsigned long group_load; /* Total load over the CPUs of the group */
> unsigned long sum_nr_running; /* Nr tasks running in the group */
> unsigned long sum_weighted_load; /* Weighted load of group's tasks */
> + unsigned long load_per_task;
> unsigned long group_capacity;
> unsigned long idle_cpus;
> unsigned long group_weight;
> @@ -4321,6 +4292,21 @@ struct sg_lb_stats {
> int group_has_capacity; /* Is there extra capacity in the group? */
> };
>
> +/*
> + * sd_lb_stats - Structure to store the statistics of a sched_domain
> + * during load balancing.
> + */
> +struct sd_lb_stats {
> + struct sched_group *busiest; /* Busiest group in this sd */
> + struct sched_group *this; /* Local group in this sd */
> + unsigned long total_load; /* Total load of all groups in sd */
> + unsigned long total_pwr; /* Total power of all groups in sd */
> + unsigned long avg_load; /* Average load across all groups in sd */
> +
> + struct sg_lb_stats this_stat; /* Statistics of this group */
> + struct sg_lb_stats busiest_stat;/* Statistics of the busiest group */
> +};
> +
> /**
> * get_sd_load_idx - Obtain the load index for a given sched domain.
> * @sd: The sched_domain whose load_idx is to be obtained.
> @@ -4533,10 +4519,11 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(st
> nr_running = rq->nr_running;
>
> /* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
> - if (local_group)
> + if (local_group) {
> load = target_load(i, load_idx);
> - else {
> + } else {
> load = source_load(i, load_idx);
> +
> if (load > max_cpu_load)
> max_cpu_load = load;
> if (min_cpu_load > load)
> @@ -4578,10 +4565,12 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(st
> (max_nr_running - min_nr_running) > 1)
> sgs->group_imb = 1;
>
> - sgs->group_capacity = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(group->sgp->power,
> - SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
> + sgs->group_capacity =
> + DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(group->sgp->power, SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
> +
> if (!sgs->group_capacity)
> sgs->group_capacity = fix_small_capacity(env->sd, group);
> +
> sgs->group_weight = group->group_weight;
>
> if (sgs->group_capacity > sgs->sum_nr_running)
> @@ -4606,7 +4595,7 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struc
> struct sched_group *sg,
> struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
> {
> - if (sgs->avg_load <= sds->max_load)
> + if (sgs->avg_load <= sds->busiest_stat.avg_load)
> return false;
>
> if (sgs->sum_nr_running > sgs->group_capacity)
> @@ -4643,7 +4632,7 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(st
> {
> struct sched_domain *child = env->sd->child;
> struct sched_group *sg = env->sd->groups;
> - struct sg_lb_stats sgs;
> + struct sg_lb_stats tmp_sgs;
> int load_idx, prefer_sibling = 0;
>
> if (child && child->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING)
> @@ -4652,14 +4641,17 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(st
> load_idx = get_sd_load_idx(env->sd, env->idle);
>
> do {
> + struct sg_lb_stats *sgs = &tmp_sgs;
> int local_group;
>
> local_group = cpumask_test_cpu(env->dst_cpu, sched_group_cpus(sg));
> - memset(&sgs, 0, sizeof(sgs));
> - update_sg_lb_stats(env, sg, load_idx, local_group, &sgs);
> + if (local_group) {
> + sds->this = sg;
> + sgs = &sds->this_stat;
> + }
>
> - sds->total_load += sgs.group_load;
> - sds->total_pwr += sg->sgp->power;
> + memset(sgs, 0, sizeof(*sgs));
> + update_sg_lb_stats(env, sg, load_idx, local_group, sgs);
>
> /*
> * In case the child domain prefers tasks go to siblings
> @@ -4671,26 +4663,17 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(st
> * heaviest group when it is already under-utilized (possible
> * with a large weight task outweighs the tasks on the system).
> */
> - if (prefer_sibling && !local_group && sds->this_has_capacity)
> - sgs.group_capacity = min(sgs.group_capacity, 1UL);
> + if (prefer_sibling && !local_group &&
> + sds->this && sds->this_stat.group_has_capacity)
> + sgs->group_capacity = min(sgs->group_capacity, 1UL);
>
> - if (local_group) {
> - sds->this_load = sgs.avg_load;
> - sds->this = sg;
> - sds->this_nr_running = sgs.sum_nr_running;
> - sds->this_load_per_task = sgs.sum_weighted_load;
> - sds->this_has_capacity = sgs.group_has_capacity;
> - sds->this_idle_cpus = sgs.idle_cpus;
> - } else if (update_sd_pick_busiest(env, sds, sg, &sgs)) {
> - sds->max_load = sgs.avg_load;
> + /* Now, start updating sd_lb_stats */
> + sds->total_load += sgs->group_load;
> + sds->total_pwr += sg->sgp->power;
> +
> + if (!local_group && update_sd_pick_busiest(env, sds, sg, sgs)) {
> sds->busiest = sg;
> - sds->busiest_nr_running = sgs.sum_nr_running;
> - sds->busiest_idle_cpus = sgs.idle_cpus;
> - sds->busiest_group_capacity = sgs.group_capacity;
> - sds->busiest_load_per_task = sgs.sum_weighted_load;
> - sds->busiest_has_capacity = sgs.group_has_capacity;
> - sds->busiest_group_weight = sgs.group_weight;
> - sds->group_imb = sgs.group_imb;
> + sds->busiest_stat = *sgs;
> }
>
> sg = sg->next;
> @@ -4734,8 +4717,8 @@ static int check_asym_packing(struct lb_
> if (env->dst_cpu > busiest_cpu)
> return 0;
>
> - env->imbalance = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(
> - sds->max_load * sds->busiest->sgp->power, SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
> + env->imbalance = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(sds->busiest_stat.avg_load *
> + sds->busiest->sgp->power, SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
>
> return 1;
> }
> @@ -4753,24 +4736,23 @@ void fix_small_imbalance(struct lb_env *
> unsigned long tmp, pwr_now = 0, pwr_move = 0;
> unsigned int imbn = 2;
> unsigned long scaled_busy_load_per_task;
> + struct sg_lb_stats *this, *busiest;
>
> - if (sds->this_nr_running) {
> - sds->this_load_per_task /= sds->this_nr_running;
> - if (sds->busiest_load_per_task >
> - sds->this_load_per_task)
> - imbn = 1;
> - } else {
> - sds->this_load_per_task =
> - cpu_avg_load_per_task(env->dst_cpu);
> - }
> + this = &sds->this_stat;
> + busiest = &sds->busiest_stat;
> +
> + if (!this->sum_nr_running)
> + this->load_per_task = cpu_avg_load_per_task(env->dst_cpu);
> + else if (busiest->load_per_task > this->load_per_task)
> + imbn = 1;
>
> - scaled_busy_load_per_task = sds->busiest_load_per_task
> - * SCHED_POWER_SCALE;
> - scaled_busy_load_per_task /= sds->busiest->sgp->power;
> + scaled_busy_load_per_task =
> + (busiest->load_per_task * SCHED_POWER_SCALE) /
> + sds->busiest->sgp->power;
>
> - if (sds->max_load - sds->this_load + scaled_busy_load_per_task >=
> - (scaled_busy_load_per_task * imbn)) {
> - env->imbalance = sds->busiest_load_per_task;
> + if (busiest->avg_load - this->avg_load + scaled_busy_load_per_task >=
> + (scaled_busy_load_per_task * imbn)) {
> + env->imbalance = busiest->load_per_task;
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -4781,33 +4763,36 @@ void fix_small_imbalance(struct lb_env *
> */
>
> pwr_now += sds->busiest->sgp->power *
> - min(sds->busiest_load_per_task, sds->max_load);
> + min(busiest->load_per_task, busiest->avg_load);
> pwr_now += sds->this->sgp->power *
> - min(sds->this_load_per_task, sds->this_load);
> + min(this->load_per_task, this->avg_load);
> pwr_now /= SCHED_POWER_SCALE;
>
> /* Amount of load we'd subtract */
> - tmp = (sds->busiest_load_per_task * SCHED_POWER_SCALE) /
> + tmp = (busiest->load_per_task * SCHED_POWER_SCALE) /
> sds->busiest->sgp->power;
> - if (sds->max_load > tmp)
> + if (busiest->avg_load > tmp) {
> pwr_move += sds->busiest->sgp->power *
> - min(sds->busiest_load_per_task, sds->max_load - tmp);
> + min(busiest->load_per_task,
> + busiest->avg_load - tmp);
> + }
>
> /* Amount of load we'd add */
> - if (sds->max_load * sds->busiest->sgp->power <
> - sds->busiest_load_per_task * SCHED_POWER_SCALE)
> - tmp = (sds->max_load * sds->busiest->sgp->power) /
> + if (busiest->avg_load * sds->busiest->sgp->power <
> + busiest->load_per_task * SCHED_POWER_SCALE) {
> + tmp = (busiest->avg_load * sds->busiest->sgp->power) /
> sds->this->sgp->power;
> - else
> - tmp = (sds->busiest_load_per_task * SCHED_POWER_SCALE) /
> + } else {
> + tmp = (busiest->load_per_task * SCHED_POWER_SCALE) /
> sds->this->sgp->power;
> + }
> pwr_move += sds->this->sgp->power *
> - min(sds->this_load_per_task, sds->this_load + tmp);
> + min(this->load_per_task, this->avg_load + tmp);
> pwr_move /= SCHED_POWER_SCALE;
>
> /* Move if we gain throughput */
> if (pwr_move > pwr_now)
> - env->imbalance = sds->busiest_load_per_task;
> + env->imbalance = busiest->load_per_task;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -4819,11 +4804,22 @@ void fix_small_imbalance(struct lb_env *
> static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
> {
> unsigned long max_pull, load_above_capacity = ~0UL;
> + struct sg_lb_stats *this, *busiest;
>
> - sds->busiest_load_per_task /= sds->busiest_nr_running;
> - if (sds->group_imb) {
> - sds->busiest_load_per_task =
> - min(sds->busiest_load_per_task, sds->avg_load);
> + this = &sds->this_stat;
> + if (this->sum_nr_running) {
> + this->load_per_task =
> + this->sum_weighted_load / this->sum_nr_running;
> + }
> +
> + busiest = &sds->busiest_stat;
> + /* busiest must have some tasks */
> + busiest->load_per_task =
> + busiest->sum_weighted_load / busiest->sum_nr_running;
> +
> + if (busiest->group_imb) {
> + busiest->load_per_task =
> + min(busiest->load_per_task, sds->avg_load);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -4831,20 +4827,19 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(s
> * max load less than avg load(as we skip the groups at or below
> * its cpu_power, while calculating max_load..)
> */
> - if (sds->max_load < sds->avg_load) {
> + if (busiest->avg_load < sds->avg_load) {
> env->imbalance = 0;
> return fix_small_imbalance(env, sds);
> }
>
> - if (!sds->group_imb) {
> + if (!busiest->group_imb) {
> /*
> * Don't want to pull so many tasks that a group would go idle.
> */
> - load_above_capacity = (sds->busiest_nr_running -
> - sds->busiest_group_capacity);
> + load_above_capacity =
> + (busiest->sum_nr_running - busiest->group_capacity);
>
> load_above_capacity *= (SCHED_LOAD_SCALE * SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
> -
> load_above_capacity /= sds->busiest->sgp->power;
> }
>
> @@ -4858,12 +4853,14 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(s
> * Be careful of negative numbers as they'll appear as very large values
> * with unsigned longs.
> */
> - max_pull = min(sds->max_load - sds->avg_load, load_above_capacity);
> + max_pull = min(busiest->avg_load - sds->avg_load,
> + load_above_capacity);
>
> /* How much load to actually move to equalise the imbalance */
> - env->imbalance = min(max_pull * sds->busiest->sgp->power,
> - (sds->avg_load - sds->this_load) * sds->this->sgp->power)
> - / SCHED_POWER_SCALE;
> + env->imbalance = min(
> + max_pull * sds->busiest->sgp->power,
> + (sds->avg_load - this->avg_load) * sds->this->sgp->power
> + ) / SCHED_POWER_SCALE;
>
> /*
> * if *imbalance is less than the average load per runnable task
> @@ -4871,9 +4868,8 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(s
> * a think about bumping its value to force at least one task to be
> * moved
> */
> - if (env->imbalance < sds->busiest_load_per_task)
> + if (env->imbalance < busiest->load_per_task)
> return fix_small_imbalance(env, sds);
> -
> }
>
> /******* find_busiest_group() helpers end here *********************/
> @@ -4895,9 +4891,9 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(s
> * return the least loaded group whose CPUs can be
> * put to idle by rebalancing its tasks onto our group.
> */
> -static struct sched_group *
> -find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env)
> +static struct sched_group *find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env)
> {
> + struct sg_lb_stats *this, *busiest;
"this" is a little confusing to read; mainly because elsewhere we've
tied this to "this cpu" whereas the local sched group is arger. (Not
to mention the obvious OOP-land overloading of "this->".)
Perhaps %s/this/local/ for sg_lb_stat references? Including this_stat
-> local_stat on sd_lb_stats?
> struct sd_lb_stats sds;
>
> memset(&sds, 0, sizeof(sds));
> @@ -4907,13 +4903,15 @@ find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env)
> * this level.
> */
> update_sd_lb_stats(env, &sds);
> + this = &sds.this_stat;
> + busiest = &sds.busiest_stat;
>
> if ((env->idle == CPU_IDLE || env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) &&
> check_asym_packing(env, &sds))
> return sds.busiest;
>
> /* There is no busy sibling group to pull tasks from */
> - if (!sds.busiest || sds.busiest_nr_running == 0)
> + if (!sds.busiest || busiest->sum_nr_running == 0)
> goto out_balanced;
>
> sds.avg_load = (SCHED_POWER_SCALE * sds.total_load) / sds.total_pwr;
> @@ -4923,26 +4921,26 @@ find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env)
> * work because they assumes all things are equal, which typically
> * isn't true due to cpus_allowed constraints and the like.
> */
> - if (sds.group_imb)
> + if (busiest->group_imb)
> goto force_balance;
>
> /* SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE trumps SMP nice when underutilized */
> - if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE && sds.this_has_capacity &&
> - !sds.busiest_has_capacity)
> + if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE && this->group_has_capacity &&
> + !busiest->group_has_capacity)
> goto force_balance;
>
> /*
> * If the local group is more busy than the selected busiest group
> * don't try and pull any tasks.
> */
> - if (sds.this_load >= sds.max_load)
> + if (this->avg_load >= busiest->avg_load)
> goto out_balanced;
>
> /*
> * Don't pull any tasks if this group is already above the domain
> * average load.
> */
> - if (sds.this_load >= sds.avg_load)
> + if (this->avg_load >= sds.avg_load)
> goto out_balanced;
>
> if (env->idle == CPU_IDLE) {
> @@ -4952,15 +4950,16 @@ find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env)
> * there is no imbalance between this and busiest group
> * wrt to idle cpu's, it is balanced.
> */
> - if ((sds.this_idle_cpus <= sds.busiest_idle_cpus + 1) &&
> - sds.busiest_nr_running <= sds.busiest_group_weight)
> + if ((this->idle_cpus <= busiest->idle_cpus + 1) &&
> + busiest->sum_nr_running <= busiest->group_weight)
While we're improving readability: idle_cpus < busiest->idle_cpus ?
This check has always been a little oddly asymmetric in that:
group_weight - sum_nr_running <= idle_cpus
This allows the case where our group has pulled lots of work to one of
its cpus, but not yet spread that out, but still keep trying to
balance because idle_cpus is high.
This is more food for thought since this patch is not changing functionality.
> goto out_balanced;
> } else {
> /*
> * In the CPU_NEWLY_IDLE, CPU_NOT_IDLE cases, use
> * imbalance_pct to be conservative.
> */
> - if (100 * sds.max_load <= env->sd->imbalance_pct * sds.this_load)
> + if (100 * busiest->avg_load <=
> + env->sd->imbalance_pct * this->avg_load)
> goto out_balanced;
> }
>
>
Reviewed-by: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists