[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ioyspaju.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:32:53 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: make proc_fd_permission() thread-friendly
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> writes:
> proc_fd_permission() says "process can still access /proc/self/fd
> after it has executed a setuid()", but the "task_pid() = proc_pid()
> check only helps if the task is group leader, /proc/self points to
> /proc/leader-pid.
>
> Change this check to use task_tgid() so that the whole process can
> access /proc/self/fd.
There is at least a semantic goofiness here.
There is /proc/<tgid>/fd and /proc/<tgid>/task/<pid>/fd, and the same
permission check is used by both.
We might just want to have a /proc/thread symlink as well so people
don't have this issue. Of course that would require people to use it,
and I think the common case if people care is call gettid() and build
the path themselves.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists