linux-kernel - [PATCH] cpufreq: governors: Remove duplicate check of target freq in supported range

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <521BA068.8030003@semaphore.gr>
Date:	Mon, 26 Aug 2013 21:37:28 +0300
From:	Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC:	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: governors: Remove duplicate check of target freq
 in supported range

Function __cpufreq_driver_target checks if target_freq is within
policy->min and policy->max range. generic_powersave_bias_target also
checks if target_freq is valid through cpufreq_frequency_table_target
call. So, drop the unnecessary duplicate check in *_check_cpu functions.

Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 4 ----
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c     | 3 ---
 2 files changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index 7f67a75..f62d822 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -67,8 +67,6 @@ static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load)
 			return;
 
 		dbs_info->requested_freq += get_freq_target(cs_tuners, policy);
-		if (dbs_info->requested_freq > policy->max)
-			dbs_info->requested_freq = policy->max;
 
 		__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, dbs_info->requested_freq,
 			CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
@@ -89,8 +87,6 @@ static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load)
 			return;
 
 		dbs_info->requested_freq -= get_freq_target(cs_tuners, policy);
-		if (dbs_info->requested_freq < policy->min)
-			dbs_info->requested_freq = policy->min;
 
 		__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, dbs_info->requested_freq,
 				CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index 87f3305..32f26f6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -177,9 +177,6 @@ static void od_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load)
 		/* No longer fully busy, reset rate_mult */
 		dbs_info->rate_mult = 1;
 
-		if (freq_next < policy->min)
-			freq_next = policy->min;
-
 		if (!od_tuners->powersave_bias) {
 			__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq_next,
 					CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/