linux-kernel - linux-next: build failure after merge of the libata tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130827125049.62d12bba371fe8d9df85a227@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:50:49 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the libata tree

Hi Tejun,

After merging the libata tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

In file included from drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c:14:0:
drivers/ata/libata.h:136:1: error: unknown type name 'acpi_handle'
 static inline acpi_handle ata_dev_acpi_handle(struct ata_device *dev) { return NULL; }
 ^

And several others.

Caused by commit f1bc1e4c44b1 ("ata: acpi: rework the ata acpi bind
support").  All the world does not have the ACPI include files
included via some other path ... nor wants them, I suspect.

I have used the libata tree from next-20130822 for today.

P.S. drivers/ata/libata.h seems to assume that a lot of other stuff is
included that it does not include explicitly ...
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped