lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:05:07 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>,
	<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the powerpc tree

Hi Rafael,

Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c between commit dc0e643afc50 ("powerpc: Make
prom.c device tree accesses endian safe") from the powerpc tree and
commits 819d596568d8 ("powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other
architectures") and 183912d352a2 ("of: move of_get_cpu_node
implementation to DT core library") from the pm tree.

I think that the latter superceded the conflicting fixes in the former,
so I just used the latter and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

P.S. Rafael, I used both your addresses because I have had a bounce from
the sisk.pl one in the past ...
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ