[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130827130507.27bd4ceda462db1751bfc30d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:05:07 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the powerpc tree
Hi Rafael,
Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c between commit dc0e643afc50 ("powerpc: Make
prom.c device tree accesses endian safe") from the powerpc tree and
commits 819d596568d8 ("powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other
architectures") and 183912d352a2 ("of: move of_get_cpu_node
implementation to DT core library") from the pm tree.
I think that the latter superceded the conflicting fixes in the former,
so I just used the latter and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
P.S. Rafael, I used both your addresses because I have had a bounce from
the sisk.pl one in the past ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists