| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87r4dfv9vj.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:03:12 +0900 From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf ui/gtk: Separate out GTK code to a shared object (v4) Hi Arnaldo, Sorry for late reply. On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:17:34 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:05:00AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: >> But I expected that after the first patch 'perf --gtk' would work, and >> it doesn't. >> >> Now even after I applied the whole series I don't get --gtk to work, >> neither as a non-root nor as root :-\ >> >> Investigating... > > Somehow I expected ~/lib64/ was in the ld library path, it was not, duh, > after I added it, and applied all three patches, it works as expected, > so can we: > > 1. combine the three patches into just one so that we keep the 'perf > report --gtk' bisectable? > > 2. add a patch to warn the user when '--gtk' is specified but no > libperf-gtk.so file is found in the loader library path? Hmm.. makes sense. I'll do the option 1 (include the warning). Thanks, Namhyung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists