linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf ui/gtk: Separate out GTK code to a shared object (v4)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130819151734.GB3053@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:17:34 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf ui/gtk: Separate out GTK code to a shared
 object (v4)

Em Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:05:00AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> But I expected that after the first patch 'perf --gtk' would work, and
> it doesn't.
> 
> Now even after I applied the whole series I don't get --gtk to work,
> neither as a non-root nor as root :-\
> 
> Investigating...

Somehow I expected ~/lib64/ was in the ld library path, it was not, duh,
after I added it, and applied all three patches, it works as expected,
so can we:

1. combine the three patches into just one so that we keep the 'perf
report --gtk' bisectable?

2. add a patch to warn the user when '--gtk' is specified but no
   libperf-gtk.so file is found in the loader library path?

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/