[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWPDzuoaJp2ko5jAbwYUBqSdPjvO5uGo-gZVsS4Wm1PKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:47:07 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 1/2] userns: Better restrictions on when proc and
sysfs can be mounted
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
> Rely on the fact that another flavor of the filesystem is already
> mounted and do not rely on state in the user namespace.
Possibly dumb question: does this check whether the pre-existing mount
has hidepid set?
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists