linux-kernel - Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 1/2] userns: Better restrictions on when proc and sysfs can be mounted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a9k2g5la.fsf@xmission.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:57:05 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 1/2] userns: Better restrictions on when proc and sysfs can be mounted

Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> writes:

> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Eric W. Biederman
> <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>>
>> Rely on the fact that another flavor of the filesystem is already
>> mounted and do not rely on state in the user namespace.
>
> Possibly dumb question: does this check whether the pre-existing mount
> has hidepid set?

Not currently. 

It may be worth doing something with respect to hidepid.  I forget what
hidepid tries to do, and I need to dash.  But feel free to cook up a
follow on patch.

My goal is simply to reduce the hack level and increase the readability
and maintainability of the code.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/