[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1308280841530.22743@axis700.grange>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:18:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DMA: shdma: fix a bad merge - remove free_irq()
Hi Vinod,
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 04:46:51PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Ok, to me it looks like you did fix some patches in the topic/sh branch,
> > but:
> >
> > patch "DMA: shdma: move two macros to a header" is missing
> > patch "dma: use dev_get_platdata()" is missing (but ok, it's common for
> > drivers/dma, not sh-specific)
> I havent applied that yet, its in my queue..
> > patch "shdma: fixup sh_dmae_get_partial() calculation error" is missing
> Can you resend these two...?
Ok, sorry, there was some confusion: yesterday no -next tree was
available, so, I had to use the ARM sh-mobile tree with your slave-dma
"next" branch merged on top. So, of the 3 above patches
1. "DMA: shdma: move two macros to a header"
2. "dma: use dev_get_platdata()"
3. "shdma: fixup sh_dmae_get_partial() calculation error"
#2 and #3 are already in "next" as 3c4d927 and d4adcc0 respectively, so,
no need to resend. #1 is available here
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2831934/
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists