[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGa+x87xcVBxc7_AV8mmGq8DWuhgA3EL6jiwqQD33terH4XPBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 07:42:26 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mfd: asic3: Remove .set_pwr() callback
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> (Dropping Ian Molton <ian.molton@...labora.co.uk> from the CC list as the e-
> mail address isn't valid anymore)
>
> On Wednesday 28 August 2013 08:41:26 Lee Jones wrote:
>> > > Since 3af9d15 "mmc: tmio-mmc: Remove .set_pwr() callback from
>> > > platform data", .set_pwr() callback is removed from platform data.
>> > > Thus, .set_pwr() is not used anymore. Also, this patch fixes
>> > > the following build error and warning.
>> > >
>> > > drivers/mfd/asic3.c:724:2: error: unknown field 'set_pwr' specified in
>> > > initializer drivers/mfd/asic3.c:724:2: warning: initialization makes
>> > > integer from pointer without a cast [enabled by default]
>> > > drivers/mfd/asic3.c:724:2: warning: (near initialization for
>> > > 'asic3_mmc_data.capabilities' [enabled by default]
>> >
>> > My bad, it looks like I've overlooked a few users of the .set_pwr() field
>> > :-/ Sorry about that.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> > I don't think blindly removing the function is the right fix, as it seems
>> > to be needed. Looking at the whole series, I believe we should just
>> > revert 3af9d15 "mmc: tmio-mmc: Remove .set_pwr() callback from platform
>> > data" instead.
>>
>> No need to revert it, as it's not in Mainline yet. Just request for it
>> to be removed from Chris' tree.
>
> I spupose it depends on whether Chris has provided a stable branch with the
> patch included. I'm fine with both, the commit just needs to be undone one way
> or another.
Any progress on this? linux-next builds are still failing for the
following defconfigs because of this removal:
Failed defconfigs:
arm-magician_defconfig
arm-eseries_pxa_defconfig
Errors:
arm-magician_defconfig
drivers/mfd/asic3.c:724:2: error: unknown field 'set_pwr' specified in
initializer
arm-eseries_pxa_defconfig
drivers/mfd/t7l66xb.c:146:2: error: unknown field 'set_pwr' specified
in initializer
drivers/mfd/tc6387xb.c:123:2: error: unknown field 'set_pwr' specified
in initializer
drivers/mfd/tc6393xb.c:381:2: error: unknown field 'set_pwr' specified
in initializer
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists