[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5649106.WzMa2Sr8sS@avalon>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:59:11 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mfd: asic3: Remove .set_pwr() callback
Hi Chris,
On Thursday 29 August 2013 07:42:26 Kevin Hilman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 August 2013 08:41:26 Lee Jones wrote:
> >> > > Since 3af9d15 "mmc: tmio-mmc: Remove .set_pwr() callback from
> >> > > platform data", .set_pwr() callback is removed from platform data.
> >> > > Thus, .set_pwr() is not used anymore. Also, this patch fixes
> >> > > the following build error and warning.
> >> > >
> >> > > drivers/mfd/asic3.c:724:2: error: unknown field 'set_pwr' specified
> >> > > in initializer drivers/mfd/asic3.c:724:2: warning: initialization
> >> > > makes integer from pointer without a cast [enabled by default]
> >> > > drivers/mfd/asic3.c:724:2: warning: (near initialization for
> >> > > 'asic3_mmc_data.capabilities' [enabled by default]
> >> >
> >> > My bad, it looks like I've overlooked a few users of the .set_pwr()
> >> > field
> >> >
> >> > :-/ Sorry about that.
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >> > I don't think blindly removing the function is the right fix, as it
> >> > seems to be needed. Looking at the whole series, I believe we should
> >> > just revert 3af9d15 "mmc: tmio-mmc: Remove .set_pwr() callback from
> >> > platform data" instead.
> >>
> >> No need to revert it, as it's not in Mainline yet. Just request for it
> >> to be removed from Chris' tree.
> >
> > I spupose it depends on whether Chris has provided a stable branch with
> > the patch included. I'm fine with both, the commit just needs to be undone
> > one way or another.
>
> Any progress on this? linux-next builds are still failing for the
> following defconfigs because of this removal:
Chris, could you please drop 3af9d15 "mmc: tmio-mmc: Remove .set_pwr()
callback from platform data" from your tree or revert it ?
> Failed defconfigs:
> arm-magician_defconfig
> arm-eseries_pxa_defconfig
>
> Errors:
>
> arm-magician_defconfig
> drivers/mfd/asic3.c:724:2: error: unknown field 'set_pwr' specified in
> initializer
>
> arm-eseries_pxa_defconfig
> drivers/mfd/t7l66xb.c:146:2: error: unknown field 'set_pwr' specified
> in initializer
> drivers/mfd/tc6387xb.c:123:2: error: unknown field 'set_pwr' specified
> in initializer
> drivers/mfd/tc6393xb.c:381:2: error: unknown field 'set_pwr' specified
> in initializer
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists