[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <002901cea45e$1d0b8b60$5722a220$%han@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:18:56 +0900
From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
To: 'Greg Kroah-Hartman' <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
'Anton Vorontsov' <anton@...msg.org>
Cc: 'Dan Carpenter' <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
'David Woodhouse' <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 'Joe Perches' <joe@...ches.com>,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
'Mark Brown' <broonie@...nel.org>,
'Jingoo Han' <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/35] power: use dev_get_platdata()
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:07 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:18:49PM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:36:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
> > > choice. That's the end of the story.
> >
> > Just to clarify: I don't want to take the patch for a reason, not just
> > because of my mood today. Once the patch comes in combination with another
> > patch (or a plan) that actually makes use of the wrapper function, then
> > I'd happily apply/ack it.
> >
> > This is the same story as global checkpatch.pl fixes: they are more harm
> > than good, and without the actual use of the dev_get_platdata(), the patch
> > falls into "global checkpatch.pl fixes" category.
>
> If you view this as a checkpatch.pl fixup, I'll be glad to take it
> through my tree instead, to ease the patch burden on you :)
Hi Greg,
I agree with you.
Thank you for your suggestion. :-)
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists