linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] fuse: wait for writeback in fuse_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 Aug 2013 11:13:48 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
Cc:	fuse-devel <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fuse: wait for writeback in fuse_file_fallocate() -v2

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> BTW, isn't it enough to do the filemap_write_and_wait() *plus* the
> fuse_set_nowrite()?

Thought about it a bit and I think this should do fine.

Any writes before the fallocate will go trough before the fallocate.
i_mutex guarantees that only one instance of fuse_set_nowrite() is
running.  Any mmaped writes during the fallocate() will go after the
fallocate request and the page cache truncation and that's fine too.
Page cache is consistent since it doens't contain pages for those
writes to the hole.  Subsequent reads to that area will fill them in.

Any other concerns?

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/