[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130830125014.GD12181@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:50:14 +0100
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To: Akira Hayakawa <ruby.wktk@...il.com>
Cc: dm-devel@...hat.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mpatocka@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agk@...hat.com,
kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC] dm-lc: plan to go to staging
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 09:33:29PM +0900, Akira Hayakawa wrote:
> I have three candidates on my mind.
> I am thinking of removing the dm- prefix as bcache and enhanceio do.
Yes, that's fine for the general way of referring to this.
(Within the codebase, the filename and module name would still need the
prefix: we use this for auto-module loading, function name/error message
scoping etc.)
> a) It writes in-coming writes in log-structured manner.
> b) It is extremely fast in write.
> c) It is caching software.
Another candidate: 'lcache' - contrast with 'bcache
> 3) writeboost or wboost
> Concentrating on the characteristic b)
> but doesn't mention cache.
I quite like that option.
Alasdair
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists