[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5220AF0C.4020106@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 23:41:16 +0900
From: Akira Hayakawa <ruby.wktk@...il.com>
To: dm-devel@...hat.com
CC: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mpatocka@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agk@...hat.com,
kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC] dm-lc: plan to go to staging
> (Within the codebase, the filename and module name would still need the
> prefix: we use this for auto-module loading, function name/error message
> scoping etc.)
>> 3) writeboost or wboost
>> Concentrating on the characteristic b)
>> but doesn't mention cache.
>
> I quite like that option.
OK,
I would like to rename from dm-lc to dm-writeboost.
Do you agree?
Akira
On 8/30/13 9:50 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 09:33:29PM +0900, Akira Hayakawa wrote:
>> I have three candidates on my mind.
>> I am thinking of removing the dm- prefix as bcache and enhanceio do.
>
> Yes, that's fine for the general way of referring to this.
> (Within the codebase, the filename and module name would still need the
> prefix: we use this for auto-module loading, function name/error message
> scoping etc.)
>
>> a) It writes in-coming writes in log-structured manner.
>> b) It is extremely fast in write.
>> c) It is caching software.
>
> Another candidate: 'lcache' - contrast with 'bcache
>
>> 3) writeboost or wboost
>> Concentrating on the characteristic b)
>> but doesn't mention cache.
>
> I quite like that option.
>
> Alasdair
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists