[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50810.1377874041@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:47:21 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Akira Hayakawa <ruby.wktk@...il.com>
Cc: dm-devel@...hat.com, mpatocka@...hat.com, agk@...hat.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC] dm-lc: plan to go to staging
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:33:29 +0900, Akira Hayakawa said:
> Candidates:
> 1) logcache
> Not too long but explaining enough
> but looks little bit dull to me.
Descriptive but dull naming is a much underrated quality in software packages.
Consider the package HarfBuzz.
As my daughter put it, "Sounds like a bad coffee name".
rpm -qi harfbuzz says:
Description :
HarfBuzz is an implementation of the OpenType Layout engine.
(And don't get me started on the people who name packages enca, fros, serd,
yajl, or yaml. We aren't using ASR-33's anymore, brevity isn't as crucial :)
dm-logcache works just fine for me as a name for this. Or dm-lcache.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists