[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130830170618.GE30088@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 19:06:18 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] imx-drm: Fix probe failure
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:08:14PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > It's not about the module refcount. It's only that a on a drm device
> > which is in use you better do not add/remove components.
> >
> > Again: The imx-drm driver does *not* do hotplugging. It will *not* add
> > or remove components when the device is opened. The code you remove
> > exactly makes (or made before Daniels patch) that sure.
>
> I am not sure what would be the correct fix for this.
Why not use (struct drm_device)->open_count as suggested earlier?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists