[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130830130331.1e260e85@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:03:31 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: x86-32: Early microcode loading stumbles over disabled
DYNAMIC_FTRACE
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:35:18 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 08/30/2013 08:51 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > It does when dynamic tracing is enabled. But this issue is with static
> > tracing, there's no code modification, thus all functions call
> > mcount/__fentry__ and we need to look at a variable to determine if we
> > should trace or not.
> >
>
> And of course global variables are a no-no without special handling in
> pre-paging mode. Sigh.
>
> You *could* bail out of the calling address is < PAGE_OFFSET.
>
We could do that too, as static tracing already gives us high overhead,
I'm not sure how much more overhead another check like this even
matters.
Who uses static tracing? I only use it to test that it still works ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists