[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5220D350.7030008@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:16:00 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: x86-32: Early microcode loading stumbles over disabled DYNAMIC_FTRACE
On 08/30/2013 10:03 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:35:18 -0700
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
>> On 08/30/2013 08:51 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>
>>> It does when dynamic tracing is enabled. But this issue is with static
>>> tracing, there's no code modification, thus all functions call
>>> mcount/__fentry__ and we need to look at a variable to determine if we
>>> should trace or not.
>>>
>>
>> And of course global variables are a no-no without special handling in
>> pre-paging mode. Sigh.
>>
>> You *could* bail out of the calling address is < PAGE_OFFSET.
>>
>
> We could do that too, as static tracing already gives us high overhead,
> I'm not sure how much more overhead another check like this even
> matters.
It's not too expensive: a compare and a jump.
> Who uses static tracing? I only use it to test that it still works ;-)
Can we get rid of it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists