[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130830171707.GV31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 19:17:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] spinlock: A new lockref structure for lockless
update of refcount
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:43:07AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> We'll see. The real problem is that I'm not sure if I can even see the
> scalability issue on any machine I actually personally want to use
> (read: silent). On my current system I can only get up to 15%
> _raw_spin_lock by just stat'ing the same file over and over and over
> again from lots of threads.
Yeah, silent basically limits you to i7 single socket systems and sadly
Intel doesn't seem to want to make those with more than 4 cores on :/
I've got a i7-K part (SNB iirc) with a _huge_ scythe cooler and a high
efficiency fanless PSU for a system that's near noiseless -- as in my
Thinkpad actually makes more noise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists