linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dma: imx-sdma: Staticize sdma_driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130902063024.GH7376@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Sep 2013 12:00:24 +0530
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc:	s.hauer@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: imx-sdma: Staticize sdma_driver_data structures

On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 09:57:12PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
> 
> Sparse report the following warnings:
> 
> drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c:330:25: warning: symbol 'sdma_imx31' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c:351:25: warning: symbol 'sdma_imx25' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c:357:25: warning: symbol 'sdma_imx35' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c:375:25: warning: symbol 'sdma_imx51' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c:395:25: warning: symbol 'sdma_imx53' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c:414:25: warning: symbol 'sdma_imx6q' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Make the sdma_driver_data structures static.
Applied, thanks

~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/