[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52243C4E.8000007@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 12:50:46 +0530
From: George Cherian <george.cherian@...com>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
CC: <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<n.a.balandin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] cleanup of gpio_pcf857x.c
On 9/2/2013 12:25 PM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sorry for my many response.
No Issues. and thanks for the review.
>> This patch series
>> - removes the irq_demux_work
>> - Uses devm_request_threaded_irq
>> - Call the user handler iff gpio_to_irq is done.
>>
>> v1 --> v2
>> Split v1 to 3 patches
>> v2 --> v3
>> Remove the unnecessary dts patches.
>>
>>
>> George Cherian (3):
>> gpio: pcf857x: change to devm_request_threaded_irq
>> gpio: pcf857x: remove the irq_demux_work
>> gpio: pcf857x: call the gpio user handler iff gpio_to_irq is done
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> Basically, I have no objection about these patches,
> but I have 2 opinions
> - I guess we can merge #1 and #2 patches ?
> ("as is" is very OK for me though)
> - we don't need gpio->irq any more ?
> (additional patch is very OK for me)
I will sent one patch removing gpio->irq too.
>
> Best regards
> ---
> Kuninori Morimoto
--
-George
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists