[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130902103310.GF28598@console-pimps.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 11:33:10 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Roy Franz <roy.franz@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, matt.fleming@...el.com,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 RFC 00/16] EFI stub for ARM
On Tue, 13 Aug, at 10:58:16AM, Roy Franz wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Do you have any more feedback on the X86 and common code (patches
> 1-13) that needs to be addressed? Mark Salter has a working ARM64 EFI
> stub implemented based on these patches, so the common code has now
> been tested with another architecture, and he has acked these patches.
> If the current patches are OK, can this be queued for 3.12? (and into
> linux-next, if appropriate)
> The ARM portion may take a little longer based on the EFI runtime
> services patch dependencies, but getting the common code merged would
> allow the ARM64 EFI stub work to go forward independently.
>
> I can resend patches 1-13 as a new series of x86/common only changes
> if you would like.
I think resending the common patches as a new series, including Acked-by
and Reviewed-by tags, and after addressing Grant's comments is the best
idea.
We've missed the v3.12 merge window now, but we can certainly get these
into linux-next for some testing.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists