lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 2 Sep 2013 08:49:52 -0700
From:	Roy Franz <roy.franz@...aro.org>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc:	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, matt.fleming@...el.com,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 RFC 00/16] EFI stub for ARM

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug, at 10:58:16AM, Roy Franz wrote:
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>>    Do you have any more feedback on the X86 and common code (patches
>> 1-13) that needs to be addressed?  Mark Salter has a working ARM64 EFI
>> stub implemented based on these patches, so the common code has now
>> been tested with another architecture, and he has acked these patches.
>> If the current patches are OK, can this be queued for 3.12? (and into
>> linux-next, if appropriate)
>> The ARM portion may take a little longer based on the EFI runtime
>> services patch dependencies, but getting the common code merged would
>> allow the ARM64 EFI stub work to go forward independently.
>>
>> I can resend patches 1-13 as a new series of x86/common only changes
>> if you would like.
>
> I think resending the common patches as a new series, including Acked-by
> and Reviewed-by tags, and after addressing Grant's comments is the best
> idea.
>
> We've missed the v3.12 merge window now, but we can certainly get these
> into linux-next for some testing.
>
> --
> Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Thanks Matt - I'll split the common patches out to a new series and resubmit
after taking care of Grant's feeback.

Thanks,
Roy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists